INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THIS TOOL: This tool is created around the five interrelated components of an internal control structure. Within each component is a series of questions that the audit committee should focus on to assure
itself that controls are in place and functioning. These questions should be discussed in an open forum with the
individuals who have a basis for responding to the questions. The audit committee should ask for detailed answers
and examples from the management team, including key members of the financial management team, internal auditors, and independent auditors to assure itself that the system is operating as management represents. Evaluation of the internal control structure is not a one-time, but rather a continuous, event for the audit committee—the audit committee should always have its eyes and ears open for potential weaknesses in internal control and should continuously probe
the responsible parties regarding the operation of the system. These questions are written in a manner such that a “no response” indicates a weakness that must be addressed.
Control Environment - Tone at the Top
Yes
No
NotSure
Comments
Integrity and Ethical Values
1.Does the organization have a comprehensive
code of conduct, and/or other policies addressing
acceptable business practice, conflicts of interest,
and expected standards of ethical and moral behavior?
2. Is the code distributed to all employees?
3. Are all employees required to annually acknowledge
that they have read, understood, and complied
with the code?
4. Does management demonstrate through actions
its own commitment to the code of conduct?
5. Are dealings with clients and other constituents,
customers, suppliers, employees, and other parties
based on honesty and fair business practices?
6. Does management take appropriate action in
response to violations of the code of conduct?
7. Is management explicitly prohibited from
overriding established controls? What controls
are in place to provide reasonable assurance that
controls are not overridden by management? Are
deviations from this policy investigated and documented?
Are violations (if any) and the results of investigations
brought to the attention of the audit committee?
8. Is the organization proactive in reducing
fraud opportunities by (1) identifying and measuring
fraud risks, (2) taking steps to mitigate identified
risks, (3) identifying a position within the organization
to “own” the fraud prevention program,
and (4) implementing and monitoring appropriate
preventative and detective internal controls and
other deterrent measures?
9. Does the company use an anonymous ethics
and fraud hotline and, if so, are procedures in
place to investigate and report results to the
audit committee? (See also the tool “Sample
Whistle blower Tracking Report,” in this
toolkit.)
Commitment to Competence
1. Are the level of competence and the requisite
knowledge and skills defined for each job in the
accounting and internal audit organizations?
2. Does management make an effort to determine
whether the accounting and internal audit organizations
have adequate knowledge and skills to do their
jobs?
Board of Directors and/or Audit Committee
1. Are the audit committee’s responsibilities
defined in a charter? If so, is the charter updated
annually and approved by the board of directors?
(See also the tool “Audit Committee Charter
Matrix,” in this toolkit.)
2. Are audit committee members independent of
the company and of management? Do audit committee
members have the knowledge, industry experience,
and financial expertise to serve effectively in
their role?
3. Are a sufficient number of meetings held,
and are the meetings of sufficient length and
depth to cover the agenda and provide healthy
discussion of issues?
4. Does the audit committee constructively challenge
management’s planned decisions, particularly
in the area of financial reporting, and probe
the evaluation of past results?
5. Are regular meetings held between the audit
committee and the CFO, the CAE (internal audit),
other key members of the financial management
and reporting team, and the independent auditors?
Are executive sessions conducted on a regular
basis? (See also the tool “Conducting an
Audit Committee Executive Session: Guidelines
and Questions,” in this toolkit.)
6. Does the audit committee approve internal
audit’s annual audit plan?
7. Does the audit committee receive key information
from management in sufficient time in advance
of meetings to prepare for discussions at the
meetings?
8. Does a process exist for informing audit
committee members about significant issues on
a timely basis and in a manner conducive to the
audit committee having a full understanding of
the issues and their implications? (See also the
tool “Issues Report from Management,”
in this toolkit.)
9. Is the audit committee informed about personnel
turnover in key functions including the audit
team (both internal and the independent auditors),
senior executives, and key personnel in the financial
accounting and reporting teams? Are unusual employee
turnover situations observed for patterns or other
indicators of problems?
Management’s Philosophy and Operating Style
1. Is the accounting function viewed as a team
of competent professionals bringing information,
order, and controls to decision-making?
2. Is the selection of accounting principles
made in the long-term best interest of the organization
(as opposed to short-term maximization of income)?
3. Are assets, including intellectual assets,
protected from unauthorized access and use?
4. Do managers respond appropriately to unfavorable
signals and reports?
5. Are estimates and budgets reasonable and
achievable?
Organizational Structure
1. Is the organizational structure within the
accounting function and the internal audit function
appropriate for the size of the organization?
2. Are key managers in the accounting and internal
audit functions given adequate definition of their
responsibilities?
3. Do sufficient numbers of employees exist,
particularly at the management levels in the accounting
and internal audit functions, to allow those individuals
to effectively carry out their responsibilities?
Assignment of Authority and Responsibility
1. Is the authority delegated appropriate for
the responsibilities assigned?
2. Are job descriptions in place for management
and supervisory personnel in the accounting and
internal audit functions?
3. Do senior managers get involved as needed
to provide direction, address issues, correct
problems, and/or implement improvements?
Human Resources Policies and Practices
1. Are policies and procedures in place for
hiring, training, promoting, and compensating
employees in the accounting and internal audit
functions?
2. Do employees understand that sub-standard
performance will result in remedial action?
3. Is remedial or corrective action taken in
response to departures from approved policies?
4. Do employees understand the performance criteria
necessary for promotions and salary increases?
Risk Assessment
1. Does the organization consider risks from
external sources such as creditor demands, economic
conditions, regulation, or labor relations?
2. Does the organization consider risks from
internal sources such as key employees (retention
and succession planning), financing and the availability
of funding for key programs, competitive compensation
and benefits, information systems security, and
backup systems?
3. Is the risk of a misstatement of the financial
statements considered, and are steps taken to
mitigate that risk?
4. If applicable, are the risks associated with
foreign/off-shore operations considered, including
their impact on the financial reporting process?
Control Activities
1. Does the organization have a process in place
to ensure that controls as described in its policy
and procedures manuals are applied as they are
meant to be applied? Do the policy and procedures
manuals document all important policies and procedures?
Are these policies and procedures reviewed and
updated on a regular basis? If so, by whom?
2. Do supervisory personnel review the functioning
of controls? If so, how is that review conducted
and what happens to the results? Is appropriate
and timely follow-up action taken on exceptions?
Information and Communication
1. Is a process in place to collect information
from external sources, such as industry, economic,
and regulatory information, that could have an
impact on the organization and/or the financial
reporting process
2. Are milestones to achieve financial reporting
objectives monitored to ensure that timing deadlines
are met?
3. Is necessary operational and financial information
communicated to the right people in the organization
on a timely basis and in a format that facilitates
its use, including new or changed policies and
procedures?
4. Is a process in place to respond to new information
needs in the organization on a timely basis?
5. Is there a process in place to collect and
document errors or complaints to analyze, determine
cause, and eliminate a problem from recurring
in future?
6. Is a process established and communicated
to officers, employees, and others, about how
to communicate suspected instances of wrongdoing
by the organization or employees of the organization?
Further, does a process exist to ensure that anyone
making such a report is protected from retaliation
for making one? (See also the tool entitled “Sample
Whistle blower Tracking Report,” in this
toolkit.)
Monitoring
1. Do officers and employees understand their
obligation to communicate observed weaknesses
in design or compliance with the internal control
structure of the organization to the appropriate
supervisory or management personnel?
2. Are interactions with external stakeholders
periodically evaluated to determine if they are
indicative of a weakness in the internal controls
structure? (For example, consider the frequency
of complaints about incorrect invoices, statements,
and acknowledgments.)
3. Is there follow-up on recommendations from
the internal and external auditors for improvements
to the internal control system?
4. Are personnel required to sign off, indicating
their performance of critical control activities
such as performing reconciliations?
5. Does the internal audit team have the right
number of competent and experienced staff? Do
they have access to the board of directors and
audit committee? Is the reporting structure in
place to ensure their objectivity and independence?
Is the work of the internal audit team appropriate
to the organization’s needs, and prioritized
with the audit committee’s direction?
The Audit Committee Toolkit was reproduced with permission of AICPA, Inc. from the AICPA Audit Committee Toolkit,
Copyright 2005 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, NY. www.aicpa.org